行政規制權限不行使與課予義務訴訟──日本法與台灣法之比較研究

View Statistics Email Alert RSS Feed

Information

Details

Project title/計畫英文名

Project Number/計畫編號

MOST 106-2410-H-033-024-

Translated Name/計畫中文名

行政規制權限不行使與課予義務訴訟──日本法與台灣法之比較研究

Project Principal Investigator/計畫主持人

Lin, Meng-Nan

Funding Organization/主管機關

國家科學及技術委員會

Department/Unit/單位系所

Financial & Economic Law

Start date/計畫起

01-08-2017

Expected Completion/計畫迄

31-07-2018

本計畫擬從訴訟法角度考察人民如何運用課予義務訴訟，促使行政對第三人發動規制權限，以保護自身權利。雖然學說與實務對於訴訟權能及檢舉函覆之法律性質之問題，已有豐富討論，但本計畫擬指出向來研究不足之處，檢討以下三項課題，以克服現行實務保守態度。第一，行政規制權限行使之行政過程與司法過程。第二，行政過程與司法介入之時機──訴之利益。第三，作為義務與裁量審查──案件事證明確性。而鑑於我國法對於這三項課題之議論較少，本計畫擬以日本法為比較研究對象，檢討(1) 行政過程與司法過程之協力、(2)權利保護必要與利益衡量、(3)案件事證明確性與調查判斷之權責分配。從中探求可供我國法解釋論與立法論參考之處。
This study contends that citizens can seek mandatory orders to request an agency to use its regulatory power on a third party in an administrative state. Although there has been much research discussing the same idea and focusing on standing and nonreviewability, the court is still reluctant to allow judicial review proceedings for mandatory orders. This study will analyze the reasons why the court is very negative about mandatory orders of regulatory power and point out three perspectives to alter the court’s attitude: (1) Agency’s regulatory power in administrative process and judicial process. (2) Timing of mandatory orders. (3) Ripeness of judgment and balancing of interests. Since judicial review of mandatory orders in Taiwan has been greatly influenced by Japan, this study will compare mandatory orders in Taiwan with those in Japan. Finally, this study aims to provide a research guide to determine whether the timing of a judicial review proceeding is proper for a mandatory order in Taiwan.

Keyword(s)

行政訴訟
行政過程
課予義務訴訟
權利保護必要
利益衡量
案件事證明確性
judicial review
administrative process
administrative inaction
mandatory order
cases and controversies
balancing of interests

DSpace CRIS

行政規制權限不行使與課予義務訴訟──日本法與台灣法之比較研究

Details

Description